Success Essays logo
  • Our services
    • Personal Statement Writing
    • Book Review Writing
    • Case Study Writing
    • Coursework Writing
    • Custom Essays
    • English 102 Essays
    • Dissertation Writing
    • Thesis Writing Service
    • Writing a Perfect Essay Outline
    • Quality Essays
    • MLA Formatted Papers
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Nutrition essay Sample
    • History Essays and Dissertation
    • Write your Nursing paper like a pro
    • Term Paper Writing
  • Pricing
  • Our Guarantees
  • Why Us?
  • +1(405) 367-3611
  • Reviews ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
  • My account
  • Order now
Order Now
Uncategorized

Assignment: Capstone Paper, Part I: Introduction, Analysis of Existing Evidence, and Quality Improvement Process

6 min read
Posted on 
December 17th, 2021
Home Uncategorized Assignment: Capstone Paper, Part I: Introduction, Analysis of Existing Evidence, and Quality Improvement Process
  • Grid View
  • List View
 ExcellentProficientBasicNeeds Improvement
Required Content
Identified the quality improvement practice problem in measurable terms that reflect quality indicators.
9 (6%) – 10 (6.67%)Provided a fully developed quality improvement problem in measurable terms that reflect quality indicators with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.8 (5.33%) – 8 (5.33%)Provided a developed quality improvement problem in measurable terms that reflect quality indicators with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.7 (4.67%) – 7 (4.67%)Provided a minimally developed quality improvement problem in measurable terms that reflect quality indicators with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.0 (0%) – 6 (4%)Provided an under-developed quality improvement problem or is not in measurable terms that reflect quality indicators with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.
Required Content
Included data that suggests a practice problem exists.
9 (6%) – 10 (6.67%)Provided a fully developed description of data that suggests a practice problem exists with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.8 (5.33%) – 8 (5.33%)Provided a developed description of data that suggests a practice problem exists with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.7 (4.67%) – 7 (4.67%)Provided a minimally developed description of data that suggests a practice problem exists with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.0 (0%) – 6 (4%)Provided an under-developed description of data that suggests a practice problem exists with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.
Required Content
Provided the purpose statement/rationale for selecting the practice problem including the importance of improving patient outcomes.
18 (12%) – 20 (13.33%)Provided a fully developed purpose statement/rationale for the quality improvement problem with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.16 (10.67%) – 17 (11.33%)Provided a developed purpose statement/rationale for the quality improvement problem with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.14 (9.33%) – 15 (10%)Provided a minimally developed purpose statement/rationale for the quality improvement problem with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.0 (0%) – 13 (8.67%)Provided an under-developed purpose statement/rationale for the quality improvement problem with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.
Required Content
Synthesize the findings from the analysis of evidence that support the practice problem and meets all requirements.
36 (24%) – 40 (26.67%)Provided a fully developed synthesis of findings from the analysis of evidence.32 (21.33%) – 35 (23.33%)Provided a developed synthesis of the findings from the analysis of evidence.28 (18.67%) – 31 (20.67%)Provided a minimally developed synthesis of the findings with limited analysis of the evidence.0 (0%) – 27 (18%)Provided an under-developed synthesis with little or no analysis of the evidence.
Required Content
Applied a quality improvement process and quality model to the practice problem and explain why they were chosen.
23 (15.33%) – 25 (16.67%)Provided a fully developed discussion of the selected quality improvement process and quality model including explanation of why each was selected with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.20 (13.33%) – 22 (14.67%)Provided a developed discussion of the selected quality improvement process and quality model including explanation of why each was selected with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.18 (12%) – 19 (12.67%)Provided a minimally developed discussion of the selected quality improvement process and quality model including explanation of why each was selected with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.0 (0%) – 17 (11.33%)Provided an under-developed discussion of the selected quality improvement process and quality model including explanation of why each was selected with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.
Required Content
Chose a specific quality improvement tool that will be used throughout the project and explain why it was chosen.
14 (9.33%) – 15 (10%)Provided a fully developed discussion of the selected quality improvement tool including a justification of its selection with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.12 (8%) – 13 (8.67%)Provided a developed discussion of the selected quality improvement tool including a justification of its selection with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.11 (7.33%) – 11 (7.33%)Provided a minimally developed discussion of the selected quality improvement tool including a justification of its selection with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.0 (0%) – 10 (6.67%)Provided an under-developed discussion of the selected quality improvement tool including a justification of its selection with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.
Professional Writing: Clarity, Flow, and Organization9 (6%) – 10 (6.67%)Content is free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates very well-formed sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is completely clear, logical, and well-organized.8 (5.33%) – 8 (5.33%)Content contains minor spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is mostly clear, logical, and well-organized.7 (4.67%) – 7 (4.67%)Content contains moderate spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates adequate sentence and paragraph structure and may require some editing. Content presented is adequately clear, logical, and/or organized, but could benefit from additional editing/revision.0 (0%) – 6 (4%)Content contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing does not demonstrate adequate sentence and paragraph structure and requires additional editing/proofreading. Key sections of presented content lack clarity, logical flow, and/or organization.
Professional Writing: Context, Audience, Purpose, and Tone9 (6%) – 10 (6.67%)Content clearly demonstrates awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free from bias, and style is appropriate for the professional setting/workplace context.8 (5.33%) – 8 (5.33%)Content demonstrates satisfactory awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is consistent with the professional setting/workplace context.7 (4.67%) – 7 (4.67%)Content demonstrates basic awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is somewhat professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is mostly consistent with the professional setting/workplace context.0 (0%) – 6 (4%)Content minimally or does not demonstrate awareness of context, audience, and/or purpose. Writing is not reflective of professional/scholarly tone and/or is not free of bias. Style is inconsistent with the professional setting/workplace context and reflects the need for additional editing.
Professional Writing: Originality, Source Credibility, and Attribution of Ideas9 (6%) – 10 (6.67%)Content reflects original thought and writing and proper paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates full adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references.8 (5.33%) – 8 (5.33%)Content adequately reflects original writing and paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates adequate adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references.7 (4.67%) – 7 (4.67%)Content somewhat reflects original writing and paraphrasing. Writing somewhat demonstrates adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references.0 (0%) – 6 (4%)Content does not adequately reflect original writing and/or paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates inconsistent adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and reference.
Total Points: 150

Name: NURS_4220_Week

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Assignment: Capstone Paper, Part I: Introduction, Analysis of Existing Evidence, and Quality Improvement Process
Just from $10/Page
Order Essay

Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:

Turnitin Report

Formatting

Title Page

Citation

Outline

Place an Order
Share
Tweet
Share
Tweet
Calculate the price
Pages (275 words)
$0.00
Success Essays
Company
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • Why Us?
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Legal
  • Our Guarantees
  • Money Back Guarantee
  • Revision Policy
  • Refund Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
How Our Service is Used:
Success Essays essays are NOT intended to be forwarded as finalized work as it is only strictly meant to be used for research and study purposes. Success Essays does not endorse or condone any type of plagiarism.
Subscribe
No Spam
  • Personal Statement Writing
  • Book Review Writing
  • Case Study Writing
  • Coursework Writing
  • Custom Essays
  • English 102 Essays
  • Dissertation Writing
  • Thesis Writing Service
  • Writing a Perfect Essay Outline
  • Quality Essays
  • MLA Formatted Papers
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Nutrition essay Sample
  • History Essays and Dissertation
  • Write your Nursing paper like a pro
  • Term Paper Writing
© 2022 Success Essays. All rights reserved.
Success Essays will be listed as ‘Success Essays’ on your bank statement.