Name: NURS_4220_Week5_Assignment_Rubric
- Grid View
- List View
| Excellent | Proficient | Basic | Needs Improvement | |
| Required Content Provided a detailed explanation of the evidence-based practice quality improvement plan used to address the practice problem. | 50 (33.33%) – 60 (40%)Provided a fully developed evidence-based practice performance improvement plan with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues. | 40 (26.67%) – 49 (32.67%)Provided a developed evidence-based practice performance improvement plan with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. | 30 (20%) – 39 (26%)Provided a minimally developed evidence-based practice performance improvement plan with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. | 0 (0%) – 29 (19.33%)Provided an under-developed evidence-based practice performance improvement plan with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. |
| Required Content Described resources that will be needed to support the change in practice and explained why each resource is necessary. | 36 (24%) – 40 (26.67%)Provided a fully developed explanation of resources used to support the plan and why each resource is needed with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues. | 32 (21.33%) – 35 (23.33%)Provided a developed explanation of resources used to support the plan and why each resource is needed with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. | 28 (18.67%) – 31 (20.67%)Provided a minimally developed explanation of resources used to support the plan and why each resource is needed with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. | 0 (0%) – 27 (18%)Provided an under-developed explanation of resources used to support the plan and why each resource is needed with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. |
| Required Content Provided a comprehensive concluding summary with no new additional information included. | 15 (10%) – 20 (13.33%)Provided a fully developed summary with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues. | 11 (7.33%) – 14 (9.33%)Provided a developed summary with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. | 6 (4%) – 10 (6.67%)Provided a minimally developed summary with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. | 0 (0%) – 5 (3.33%)Provided an under-developed summary with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. |
| Professional Writing: Clarity, Flow, and Organization | 9 (6%) – 10 (6.67%)Content is free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates very well-formed sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is completely clear, logical, and well-organized. | 8 (5.33%) – 8 (5.33%)Content contains minor spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is mostly clear, logical, and well-organized. | 7 (4.67%) – 7 (4.67%)Content contains moderate spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates adequate sentence and paragraph structure and may require some editing. Content presented is adequately clear, logical, and/or organized, but could benefit from additional editing/revision. | 0 (0%) – 6 (4%)Content contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing does not demonstrate adequate sentence and paragraph structure and requires additional editing/proofreading. Key sections of presented content lack clarity, logical flow, and/or organization. |
| Professional Writing: Context, Audience, Purpose, and Tone | 9 (6%) – 10 (6.67%)Content clearly demonstrates awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free from bias, and style is appropriate for the professional setting/workplace context. | 8 (5.33%) – 8 (5.33%)Content demonstrates satisfactory awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is consistent with the professional setting/workplace context. | 7 (4.67%) – 7 (4.67%)Content demonstrates basic awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is somewhat professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is mostly consistent with the professional setting/workplace context. | 0 (0%) – 6 (4%)Content minimally or does not demonstrate awareness of context, audience, and/or purpose. Writing is not reflective of professional/scholarly tone and/or is not free of bias. Style is inconsistent with the professional setting/workplace context and reflects the need for additional editing. |
| Professional Writing: Originality, Source Credibility, and Attribution of Ideas | 9 (6%) – 10 (6.67%)Content reflects original thought and writing and proper paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates full adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. | 8 (5.33%) – 8 (5.33%)Content adequately reflects original writing and paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates adequate adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. | 7 (4.67%) – 7 (4.67%)Content somewhat reflects original writing and paraphrasing. Writing somewhat demonstrates adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. | 0 (0%) – 6 (4%)Content does not adequately reflect original writing and/or paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates inconsistent adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and reference. |
| Total Points: 150 |
Name: NURS_4220_Week5_Assignment_Rubric
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Assignment: Capstone Paper, Part II: Quality Improvement Plan, Resources and Conclusion
Just from $10/Page
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
