EDUC 730
Educational And Digital Equity in the Digital Age Grading Rubric
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Educational and Digital Equity in the Digital Age Assignment Instructions
Just from $10/Page
| Criteria | Levels of Achievement | |||
| Content | Advanced | Proficient | Developing | Not Present |
| Current Issues | 22 to 24 pointsThe candidate identifies current issues surrounding educational and digital access with solid detail. | 20 to 21 pointsThe candidate generally identifies current issues surrounding educational and digital access providing sufficient detail. | 1 to 19 pointsThe candidate fails to discern current issues surrounding educational and/or digital access and/or information is lacking in detail. | 0 pointsNot present |
| Identified Gaps | 17 to 18 pointsThe candidate applies data sourcing to identify equity and access gaps that currently exist at either the national, state, or local level providing solid detail. | 15 to 16 pointsThe candidate generally applies data sourcing to identify equity and access gaps that currently exist at either the national, state, or local providing sufficient detail. | 1 to 14 pointsThe candidate fails to adequately apply data sourcing to identify equity and access gaps that currently exist and/or information is lacking in detail. | 0 pointsNot present |
| Synthesis | 22 to 24 pointsThe candidate synthesizes current literature to explain the importance of equitable access and learning opportunities for all students and why certain gaps in access may exist. | 20 to 21 pointsThe synthesis is somewhat lacking in one or more of the following:the importance of equitable accessthe importance of equitable learning opportunities for all studentsreasons certain gaps in access may exist. | 1 to 19 pointsThe synthesis is significantly lacking in one or more of the following:the importance of equitable accessthe importance of equitable learning opportunitiesreasons gaps in access may exist. | 0 pointsNot present |
| Equity as a Form of Justice | 16 to 17 pointsThe candidate advocatesfor equitable access to educational technology, digital content, and learning opportunities for all students with a focus on underrepresented populations, both in and out of school, and defends their informed view on access as a social justice issue. | 14 to 15 pointsThe candidate generally advocates for equitable access for all students with a focus on underrepresented populations, both in and out of school, and defends their informed view on access as a social justice issue. | 1 to 13 pointsThe candidate fails to adequately advocate for equitable access and learning opportunities for all students, and/or fails to focus on underrepresented populations, and/or fails to defend their view on access as a social justice issue. | 0 pointsNot present |
| Strategies | 16 to 17 pointsThe candidate determines strategies for addressing identified gaps to best ensure equitable access. | 14 to 15 pointsThe candidate generally identifies strategies for addressing identified gaps to ensure equitable access. | 1 to 13 pointsThe candidate only somewhat identifies strategies to address gaps and/or strategies do not adequately ensure equitable access. | 0 pointsNot present |
| Structure | Advanced | Proficient | Developing | Not Present |
| APA | 6 pointsThe candidate uses correct APA formatting for in-text citations and references throughout the document. | 5 pointsThe candidate only has two or fewer issues of APA formatting for in-text citations and references throughout the document. | 1 to 4 pointsThe candidate has three or more issues of APA formatting for in-text citations and references throughout the document. | 0 pointsNot present |
| Length and Terminology | 7 pointsThe body of the paper is between 8 and 10 pages in length. The candidate demonstrates appropriate use of the key terminology for the topic. | 6 pointsThe body of the paper is at least 7 pages in length and the candidate generally demonstrates appropriate use of terminology for the topic. | 1 to 5 pointsThe body of the paper is less than 7 pages in length and/or the candidate fails to demonstrate appropriate use of key terminology for the topic. | 0 pointsNot present |
| References | 11 to 12 pointsThe candidate provides a minimum of 10 references with no fewer than 5 references from scholarly literature, at least 2 of which were published within the last year. | 10 pointsReferences are lacking in one or more aspects:At least 10 referencesAt least 5 scholarly referencesNo reference is more than 5 years oldAt least two scholarly references published within the last year | 1 to 9 pointsReferences are lacking in several aspects:At least 10At least 5 scholarlyNone more than 5 years oldAt least two scholarly references published within the last year | 0 pointsNot present |
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
