Give arguments for and against using market share as a) indicative and b) determinative of dominance
1. Give arguments for and against using market share as a) indicative and b) determinative of dominance.
2. Find one example online of an abuse of dominance investigated by the European Commission (describe the EC’s view of the dominant company, relevant market, the abusive conduct and the effect and provide a link to the case description) and give an example of similar behaviour in Cambodia (no need to establish dominance in Cambodia).
3. Starbucks wants to buy Burger King in Cambodia. Describe the competitive implications of that transaction in the relevant market(s) (no research required – state only reasoning about market definition and analysis of competitive market factors).