LSTD400

150 words reply tooth’s  In the Scott Mayo case, both eyewitness accounts are subjective and questionable. The statement from Joe “The Fireman” can be discredited by his relationship to Mr. Mayo. Friends utilized as eyewitnesses may be protecting their relationship by withholding evidence or information. An intelligent prosecution attorney would not discredit any of the witnesses statements and would use the fact that Mayo was under the influence against him. Drinking and utilizing a firearm is almost always illegal as well as discharging a firearm within city limits. The violation of city ordinance, the disregard for laws in regards to handling a firearm, and the known debt between Mayo and the deceased concludes guilt beyond reasonable doubt when articulated correctly. 
The defense attorney can discredit Dawn Dietz statement with two very important facts. The first fact is that Ms. Dietz had consumed three glasses of wine clouding her judgement and potentially causing her to misremember the event. The second fact is that she was not close enough to hear exactly what was being said if she was just exiting the bathroom and may hold bias against Mr. Mayo due to the previous altercations involving the television channel. These factors can completely discredit Ms. Dietz statements in regards to the events that transpired that evening. 
The statements may all be admissible or inadmissible depending on the way that the information is presented by the defense and prosecution attorneys. The admissibility of the police officers statement will most likely be considered the most reliable due to his training and the fact that he had not consumed alcohol. All other witnesses were under the influence during the time in which the events transpired leaving their statements questionable in nature. 
References
Buckles, T. (2007). Crime Scene Investigation, Criminalistics, and The Law, 1st Edition.
Godfrey, R. D., & Clark, S. E. (2010). Repeated eyewitness identification procedures: Memory, decision making, and probative value. Law and Human Behavior, 34(3), 241-258.

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Order your essay today and save 15% with the discount code SUCCESS