Having read the course readings regarding differences in using official crime data and self-reported data, I would like to identify some of the strengths and weaknesses of each of the types of data sources. As critically examined in last week’s discussion, official crime data remains an important source of knowledge about crime. However, given that official crime data must be standardized to maintain consistency, its limitations are rather obvious, it is not as detailed as self-reported data. To make it possible for the government to collect and profile every crime, there are limitations to the categories or depth of data that can be communicated by official crime data (Pollock, Menard, Elliott & Huizinga, 2015). This is however not the case with self-reported crime data. During self-reports, reporters are given the opportunity to be as detailed as possible. This opportunity allows them to get into great depth in the crime information that they provide. As a result, one main difference is that self-reported crime data tends to be more detailed.
However, its main limitation comes when there is a need to compare crime data. As a result of lacking standardization of self-reported data, comparing the data is much harder. This is where official crime data edges self-reported data. Official crime data benefits from greater consistency which supports contrasting. Moreover, self-reported data may suffer from the effects of manipulation or embedded viewpoints (Harrison, 1995). Comparatively, official crime data is collected by professionals who know what to look out for and know how to enhance the reliability and validity of the data. However, given that the reporter of self-reported data is in control of what information to provide, this type of data is not as organized as official crime data.
Harrison, L. D. (1995). The validity of self-reported data on drug use. Journal of Drug    Issues, 25(1), 91-111.
Pollock, W., Menard, S., Elliott, D. S., & Huizinga, D. H. (2015). It’s official: Predictors of   self-reported vs. officially recorded arrests. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(1), 69-79.

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Order your essay today and save 15% with the discount code SUCCESS