EDUC 730
Technology Integration: Problem-Based Learning Plan Grading Rubric
| Criteria | Levels of Achievement | |||
| Content | Advanced | Proficient | Developing | Not Present |
| SynthesisProblem-Based Learning | 8 pointsThe candidate provides a rich overview of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and what this approach looks like in classrooms, providing solid detail. | 7 pointsThe candidate provides a solid overview of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and what this approach looks like in classrooms, providing adequate detail. | 1 to 6 pointsThe overview of PBL is lacking depth and/or significantly lacking in detail. | 0 pointsNot present |
| Synthesis Technology Integration | 8 pointsThe candidate provides a rich overview for integrating technology in the classroom, providing solid detail.The five interdependent characteristics of meaningful learning environments (active, collaborative, constructive, authentic, and goal-directed) and how these relate to the five levels of integration (Entry, Adoption, Adaptation, Infusion, and Transformation) are carefully explained. | 7 pointsThe candidate provides a solid overview for integrating technology in the classroom, providing adequate detail.The five interdependent characteristics of meaningful learning environments (active, collaborative, constructive, authentic, and goal-directed) and how these relate to the five levels of integration (Entry, Adoption, Adaptation, Infusion, and Transformation) are adequately explained. | 1 to 6 pointsThe overview is lacking depth and/or significantly lacking in detail and/or the five interdependent characteristics of meaningful learning environments and/or how these relate to the five levels of integration are lacking in explanation. | 0 pointsNot present |
| Learner Analysis | 8 pointsThe candidate provides a descriptive profile that includes rich detail on learning styles, prior knowledge, skill level, attitudes towards learning, physical traits, and other relevant learner characteristics. | 7 pointsThe candidate provides a descriptive profile with adequate detail on all of the important learner characteristics | 1 to 6 pointsThe candidate provides a descriptive profile that is somewhat lacking in detail and/or excludes some important learner characteristics. | 0 pointsNot present |
| Technology Analysis | 8 pointsThe candidate provides a descriptive profile that includes rich detail onthe available technology in the local setting, including Internet access, tools, and software, and how these will be leveraged to maximize learning potentials. | 7 pointsThe candidate provides a descriptive profile that includes sufficient detail onthe available technology in the local setting, including Internet access, tools, and software, and how these will be leveraged to maximize learning potentials. | 1 to 6 pointsThe candidate provides a descriptive profile that is somewhat lacking in detail and/or excludes analysis of Internet access, tools, or software, and/or fails to provide adequate determinations on how these will be leveraged to maximize learning potentials. | 0 pointsNot present |
| Standards and Objectives | 8 pointsThe candidate provides background on the curriculum standards, the ISTE standards, and other standards used to establish the foundations of the technology integrated lesson.One to two specific curriculum standards are listed.One to two specific ISTE standards for students are listed.The candidate identifies 2-3 associated specific and measurable learning objectives and these objectives are well connected to the standards, are specific, and measurable. | 7 pointsThe candidate addresses all but one requirement listed below:Background on the curriculum standards, the ISTE standards, and other standards used to establish the foundations of the technology integrated lesson.One to two specific curriculum standards are listed.One to two specific ISTE standards for students are listed.The candidate identifies 2-3 associated specific and measurable learning objectives and these objectives are well connected to the standards, are specific, and measurable. | 1 to 6 pointsThe candidate fails to address 2 or more requirements listed below:Background on the curriculum standards, the ISTE standards, and other standards used to establish the foundations of the technology integrated lesson.One to two specific curriculum standards are listed.One to two specific ISTE standards for students are listed.The candidate identifies 2-3 associated specific and measurable learning objectives and these objectives are well connected to the standards, are specific, and measurable. | 0 pointsNot present |
| Planning the Strategies, Technology, Media, and Materials | 20 to 22 pointsThe candidate identifies strategies and methods for meaningful engagement at the Adaptation, Infusion, or Transformation levels of integration, carefully outlining vibrant ways to promote learner success. Technology, media, and materials are listed and described in detail. | 18 to 19 pointsThe candidate adequately outlines and describes ways to promote learner engagement at the Adaptation, Infusion, or Transformation levels of integration.Technology, media, and materials are listed and adequately described. | 1 to 17 pointsThe candidate fails to adequately outline and describes ways to promote learner engagement and/or strategies are largely limited to the Entry and Adoption levels of integration, and/or the technology, media, and materials are not adequately described. | 0 pointsNot present |
| Utilizing Technology, Media, and Materials | 20 to 22 pointsThe candidate carefully describes how the technology, media, and materials will be used, providing detailed step by step instructions for implementing the instructional plan. | 18 to 19 pointsThe candidate describes how the technology, media, and materials will be used, providing step by step instructions for implementing the instructional plan. | 1 to 17 pointsThe candidate fails to adequately describe how the technology, media, and materials will be used, and or fails to provide adequately detailed step-by-step instructions for implementing the instructional plan. | 0 pointsNot present |
| Requiring Learner Participation | 8 pointsThe candidate requires learner participation and active use of technology tools in vibrant ways to best meet the learning goals and objectives. Questioning is well planned to function as a part of the formative assessment. | 7 pointsThe candidate adequately identifies ways to require learner participation and active use of technology tools to meet the learning goals and objectives. Questioning is adequately planned to function as a part of the formative assessment. | 1 to 6 pointsThe candidate fails to adequately identify ways to require learner participation and active use of technology tools, and/or these are not planned in a way that clearly meets the learning goals and objectives, and/or questioning is not adequately planned to function as a part formative assessment. | 0 pointsNot present |
| Evaluation and Revision | 8 pointsThe candidate carefully plans for and describes the methods that will use to assess the learning and describes how assessment data might be used to reflect on and revise the instruction plan for future use. | 7 pointsThe candidateadequatelyplans for and describes the methods that will use to assess the learning and describes how assessment data might be used to reflect on and revise the instruction plan for future use. | 1 to 6 pointsThe candidate fails to adequately plan for and describe methods to assess the learning and/or fails to adequately describe how assessment data might be used to reflect on and revise the instruction plan for future use. | 0 pointsNot present |
| Structure | Advanced | Proficient | Developing | Not Present |
| Organization and Mechanics | 12 to 13 pointsThe learner provides a lesson that displays good practices in instructional planning with logical progression.The learners’ instructional plan is free from APA, grammar, and spelling errors. | 11 pointsThe learner provides a lesson that displays good practices in instructional planning with logical progression.Only one type of APA, grammar, and/or spelling error is noted. | 1 to 10 pointsThe learner provides a lesson that loosely displays good practices in instructional planning, and/or more than one type of APA, grammar, or spelling errors are noted, and/or errors substantially detract from the communication of the instructional plan. | 0 pointsNot present |
| Terminology | 4 pointsThe candidate demonstrates appropriate use of the key terminology from the field of educational technology. | 3 pointsThe candidate generally demonstrates appropriate use of terminology from the field of educational technology. | 1 to 2 pointsThe candidate fails to demonstrate appropriate use of key terminology from the field of educational technology. | 0 pointsNot present |
| References | 8 pointsThe learner uses the appropriate number of references. Citations and references are in correct APA format, and citations match in the body and in the reference section and vice versa. | 7 pointsThe learner uses references; however, they are not sufficient to support assertions. Citations and references have a few APA formatting errors, and one or two citations in the body do not match those in the reference section or vice versa. | 1 to 6 pointsThe learner uses references, however, they are not sufficient to support assertions. Citations and references have frequent APA formatting errors, and/or several references that appear in the body are not cited in the reference section or vice versa. | 0 pointsNot present |
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
