Write a 1 page paper on given that users prefer redress mechanisms to be independent, what justifications explain why some parts of redress mechanism are independent and others are not.
Redress mechanisms in UK Redress mechanisms in UKThe UK Administrative and Constitutional law requires that the redress systems be of service to the citizens as opposed to adherences of the set regulations1. In this case, these systems will be more inclined on championing for the rights of the citizens of UK. For instance, in the UK the Ombudsman must be vocal enough in pointing out the issues facing the public. thus, a straightforward complaint process. However, it is important to note that, despite the fact that persons wish that these mechanisms be independent, not all redress mechanisms are independent.
A good example is the tribunals that are managed by independent tribunals that automatically have to be independent. This is for the reason that they function in a quasi-judicial approach that needs no influence from other forces. These tribunals would, therefore, make it easier for implementation of policies of the tribunals. The Ombudsmen services are yet other independent bodies2. They are run under the leadership of independent Ombudsmen, mostly referred to as commissioners. These bodies need to be independent for the reason that they are charged with the responsibility of investigating various complaints from the citizens.
In the case of poor administration, or even offering of poor services to the citizens, these organizations ought to operate independently, if the results have to be free and fair. The Parliamentary and Health Services Ombudsman Offices are the most common in UK.Of essence, it would be justified to argue that redress mechanisms need to operate independently so that they can conduct reasonable investigations, and give extensive reports. References Great Britain: Law Commission, 2010. Administrative Redress: Public Bodies and the Citizen.
London: The Stationery Office.