1.If you were David Kaczynski or William Bulger (discussed on pp. 237-240 of Sandel) would you have turned your brother in, or not? Why? Were William Bulger’s responsibilities as a public university president and former president of the Massachusetts State Senate different from David Kaczynski’s as a private citizen? Different enough to dictate a different action toward one’s brother? Why or why not? What THEORIES can you bring to bear to justify or criticize the brothers’ different choices? Consult the relevant chapter of Sandel’s Justice, too.
question 2. create a post where you find a news story, link to the story, and assess the ethical stakes of the events described in the story in one